In response to the recent statement by Tuaran MP Datuk Seri Wilfred Madius Tangau, it is important to address the misconceptions and flawed understanding of the political views expressed by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad and the historical context of the formation of Malaysia.
Tangau seems to have misunderstood the intentions behind Mahathir's statements. Mahathir was simply expressing his political perspective and acknowledging the existence of a mentality rooted in Malayan imperialism and colonialism. His remarks shed light on the historical dynamics and how Sabah and Sarawak were perceived by some as colonial possessions.
Contrary to Tangau's assertion, it is crucial to note that Malaysia was not formed in 1963 but was a rebranding effort with a new name after informing the United Nations about the admission of Sabah (previously known as North Borneo), Sarawak, and Singapore (which left Malaysia in 1965). This historical accuracy is important in understanding the context of the nation's formation.
Moreover, the notion that Malaysia was intended to be a multiethnic society is a misinterpretation. The reality is that Malaysia was primarily aimed at strengthening the position of Malay hegemony, power, and influence over other races. This is evident in the socio-political landscape of the country.
Tangau's denial of the historical reality, particularly regarding Sabah and Sarawak being colonial possessions transferred from Great Britain to Tanah Melayu, is perplexing. The colonial documents clearly indicate this transfer, and it is important to acknowledge these historical facts.
It is essential to dispel any delusions and face the reality that the Malaysia Tangau believes was formed in 1963 was, in fact, a colonial arrangement between the British and Malaya. The intention of Malaya was to establish an ethnocracy, replacing the British as their colonial masters.
The revelations made by Mahathir should be seen as an opportunity to address the unresolved issue of decolonization and free Sabah and Sarawak from any lingering colonial influence. Mahathir's frankness about how he perceives Sabahans and Sarawakians as subjects of Malayan imperialism and colonialism strengthens our resolve to address these concerns.
While it is true that Lee Kuan Yew attempted to foster a multiracial Malaysia, it is important to acknowledge that this vision was rejected by certain Malayan political parties, particularly UMNO. Their ultimate intention was not to establish a multiracial country but rather to maintain Malaysia for the Malays.
The political, economic, and cultural disparities between Malaya and Sabah and Sarawak have created significant gaps that question the viability of the three regions remaining together. The identities of Sabah and Sarawak natives are distinctively rooted in their Bornean heritage and not as Malayan Malays.
Tangau's assumption that Malaya's political ideology will naturally foster a multicultural society is misguided. The structure of their political ideology is inherently designed to ensure the dominance of a single race in perpetuity, which raises concerns about genuine inclusivity and equality.
In conclusion, it is important to address the misinterpretations presented by Tangau and to acknowledge the historical realities surrounding the formation of Malaysia. We must critically evaluate the political dynamics and work towards a more inclusive and equitable future for Sabah and Sarawak.
End.
Mosses PA Ampang
President
Republic of Sabah North Borneo - RSNB (NGO)
Post a Comment